9:41 📶 🔋

Your buyer's agent

On a call · speaking

02:14

You

Is twelve Wallaroy Road in Woollahra worth the three-point-nine guide?

Agent · working

Pulling sold comps in Woollahra…

✓ Matched 6 comparable 3-bed houses, last 6 months

✓ Computed median $/m² of land & floor

Cross-checking SEIFA decile + catchment

· Drafting the verdict

Agent · speaking

Short version: it reads optimistic. Six 3-bed houses sold nearby this half at $3.35–3.55m1. This one's asking $3.9m — about 8–13% over the comp range2. The larger 512 m² block closes some of the gap. I've pinned the appraisal so you can check the comps after the call.

📌 Appraisal · pinned to this call

12 Wallaroy Rd, Woollahra

3 bed · 2 bath · 1 car · 512 m² · Guide $3.9m

~8–13% over comps

“Guide reads optimistic; the block does some of the work.”

$3.2mcomp-fair value$4.0m

$3.35–3.55m

Guide $3.9m

Land $/m²

$6.9k

vs comp median

+11%

SEIFA

Top decile

Confidence High — 6 comps within 800 m, last 6 months

📐 The 6 comps behind this number

28 Fullerton St, Woollahra

3·2·1 · 498 m² · sold Apr 2026

$3.42m

$6.9k/m²

7 Ocean St, Woollahra

3·2·2 · 471 m² · sold Mar 2026

$3.55m

$7.5k/m²

14 Trelawney St, Woollahra

3·1·1 · 455 m² · sold Feb 2026

$3.35m

$7.4k/m²

↗ Listed direct by Phillips Pantzer Donnelley · caught 3 days early

Compare

Shortlist

Agent · speaking

One gap I'll be honest about: strata isn't relevant here (it's a house), but I don't hold the flood overlay for this block — worth confirming with the listing agent. Want me to compare it against the Paddington one you liked?

🔇 In public? Tap once to type instead — the agent answers on screen.

⌨

Hold to talk

Call screen — conservative

Push-to-talk + live transcript. The spoken answer drops a tappable, pinned artifact into the thread.

Core interaction

You hold to talk (PTT — safe for a public inspection). The agent speaks a short verdict and drops an appraisal card into the transcript, pinned to the call so you can audit it after you hang up. Voice is the fast way to ask; the eyes do the comparing.

Why it fits a buyer's agent

RESEARCH §4: voice is multimodal, not voice-only — a spoken valuation you can't check is useless. Every number is a computed fact (KNOW, mint-coloured) the agent narrates around; the verdict links to the 6 comps (cite-or-abstain). The agent volunteers a missing-data gap rather than faking completeness.

States shown

Agent working — live step trace (comps → $/m² → SEIFA → verdict)
Speaking — animated mini-waveform on each agent turn
Populated — pinned appraisal artifact with provenance peek
Honest gap — flood overlay "not in our data"

Provenance surface

The “6 comps behind this number” strip inside the card — each comp is a tappable source card linking to the agency-direct listing, caught 3 days early.

Real vs faked

Real shape: Eastern-Suburbs addresses, plausible Woollahra 3-bed comps, $/m², SEIFA decile, the KNOW-vs-RATE split. Faked: static mockup — no live audio, the waveforms/spinner are CSS loops, picsum stands in for listing photos, the comp figures are illustrative.

Conservative ↔ inventive

Most shippable of the three: it's a familiar call screen grammar (PTT, transcript, end-call). The card "drops in" but the layout stays a linear thread. The inventive variant dissolves the orb itself into the artifacts.