Thinner data here — only 4 Clovelly 3-beds sold in 6mo. Guide $3.45m lands square in the band ($3.40–3.52m). I'd call this fairly priced but say so with medium confidence.
Guide history: $4.30m (Mar) → $4.10m (May) → $3.95m (yesterday). Vendor is moving toward the comps. 5 Coogee 4-bed comps support $3.85m fair value.
A briefing organised as a status board grouped by relationship to you: new & fits your brief, on your watchlist, this Saturday. Denser than the story, warmer than a plain feed. Every row expands in place to reveal the full appraisal and the comp table — the provenance lives one tap deep.
Skim the status ticker, then the grouped rows. Tap any row to expand the comp drawer (try the strong Bondi fit and the Saturday auction). The drawer is the cite-or-abstain surface: the 6 sold comps with $/m², a value-band bar showing where the guide sits, and an honest-gap note. Chat is the secondary follow-up button, not the home.
A buyer's agent keeps a running ledger of your search: what's new, what moved, what's coming up. Grouping by your relationship to each home (brief / watchlist / auction) mirrors how they actually think — and keeps the brief front-and-centre as editable chips up top.
The expanded drawer is the strongest provenance surface of the three variants: a real comp table (each row a tappable sold listing ↗), a computed value-band bar, and a stated confidence driven by comp count (high=6, med=4). Purple numbers are computed; the agent's read is prose.
Status ticker · grouped populated rows · expanded comp-table drawer · a thin-data / medium-confidence honest case (Clovelly, 4 comps) · the agent-working strip (3/5, breathing orb, tool pill) · honest-gap element.
Real to the product: grouped briefing, comp table with $/m², value band, confidence
tied to comp density, guide-history tracking, walk-away ceiling, agency-direct early-catch, editable brief.
Faked for the mock: addresses, photos & favicons (picsum), exact prices/dates,
the "2 min ago" freshness.
The middle path. It keeps variant A's scannability but adds the expand-to-audit depth and a structured board, without variant B's narrative risk. Slightly more to build (the drawer + comp table), but it's the most information-dense and the best showcase of the moat in one screen.